Should the price of everyday goods — flights, meat, fuel — automatically include their carbon cost, even if it means paying more?

Global & Geopolitical ·Sunday, July 19, 2026

Share the results and come back tomorrow.

pollinion.com

Should the price of everyday goods — flights, meat, fuel — automatically include their carbon cost, even if it means paying more?

44%consensus9responses

“Only for corporations and industries, not individual consumers who have limited alternatives”

Tap any answer, country, age or gender to filter every section. Groups smaller than 3 stay hidden to protect privacy.

All answers

Only for corporations and industries, not individual consumers who have limited alternatives44%

🇭🇷35–44Man

No — carbon taxes disproportionately hurt lower income people who cannot afford greener alternatives33%

🇧🇪🇧🇬35–44Man

Yes, but only if the revenue is directly used to fund renewable energy and climate adaptation in vulnerable countries11%

No — without universal adoption it simply moves pollution to countries with no carbon pricing rather than reducing it11%

Yes — the true environmental cost of goods should always be reflected in their price0%

Country

% chose top answer

🇭🇷Croatia60%🇧🇪Belgium100%🇧🇬Bulgaria100%

Croatia is most divided — 60% “Only for corporations and industries, not individual consumers who have limited alternatives” vs 20% “No — carbon taxes disproportionately hurt lower income people who cannot afford greener alternatives”.

2 of 9 respondents didn't share their info

Age

100%

50%

25%

50%

2 of 9 respondents didn't share their info

Gender

50%

40%

20%

Man is most divided — 40% “Only for corporations and industries, not individual consumers who have limited alternatives” vs 40% “No — carbon taxes disproportionately hurt lower income people who cannot afford greener alternatives”.

2 of 9 respondents didn't share their info

World map